From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotto-Marcano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 12, 2010
27 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 5D10-246.

February 12, 2010.

Petition for Belated Appeal, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Orlando Cotto-Marcano, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.


Orlando Cotto-Marcano seeks a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141. However, nowhere in the instant petition does Cotto-Marcano allege that he timely requested that his trial counsel appeal and trial counsel failed to do so as required by rule 9.141(c)(3)(F).

Additionally, the petition was not sworn to as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(3)(F). An affirmation that the statements made in the petition are "true and correct to the best of my knowledge" is not an adequate oath. See Moore v. State, 910 So.2d 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Therefore, we deny the petition because it is facially insufficient. See Abbot v. State, 929 So.2d 723, 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Cosby v. State, 911 So.2d 275, 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Cotto-Marcano shall have thirty (30) days in which to file a legally sufficient amended petition.

PETITION DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cotto-Marcano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 12, 2010
27 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Cotto-Marcano v. State

Case Details

Full title:Orlando COTTO-MARCANO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 12, 2010

Citations

27 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)