From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cottle v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Mar 6, 2024
5:23-cv-00003-SLG (D. Alaska Mar. 6, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-00003-SLG

03-06-2024

KEVIN WAYNE COTTLE, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Defendant.


ORDER RE STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND

SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court at Docket 14 is the parties' Stipulated Motion for Remand. Good cause being shown, the motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to sentence four of 42. U.S.C. § 405(g), IT IS ORDERED this matter is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will be directed to offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing; ensure a significant number of jobs are available or exist in the national and/or regional economy that Plaintiff can still perform, given his age, education, work experience, and residual functional capacity; and ensure the vocational expert resolves any and all conflicts with the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT), consistent with Social Security Ruling 00-4p.

Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff's application for costs and attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).


Summaries of

Cottle v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Mar 6, 2024
5:23-cv-00003-SLG (D. Alaska Mar. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Cottle v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN WAYNE COTTLE, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Alaska

Date published: Mar 6, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-00003-SLG (D. Alaska Mar. 6, 2024)