From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotter v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 2, 2013
Case No. 12-15382 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-15382

08-02-2013

PJ COTTER, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant.


Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds


JUDGMENT

The Court having reviewed and fully considered the pleadings filed by the parties, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff's objections thereto in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Court further having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made; and for the reasons set forth in an Order dated the same date as this Judgment and filed herein;

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate [11] is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court; and

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's motion to dismiss [2] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

______________________

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August 2, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager

Acting in the Absence of Carol A. Hemeyer


Summaries of

Cotter v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 2, 2013
Case No. 12-15382 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Cotter v. GMAC Mortg., LLC

Case Details

Full title:PJ COTTER, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 2, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-15382 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

Sandlin v. Citibank, N.A.

Further, as stated above, there are no allegations that the loan was in default when the Defendants obtained…

Prokop v. CrossCountry Mortg.

“In ruling on a motion to dismiss, the Court may consider the complaint as well as (1) documents referenced…