From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Jan 19, 2021
631 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

ED 108296

01-19-2021

David Anthony COSTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan A. DeGeorge, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Susan A. DeGeorge, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Robin Ransom, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Costa (Movant) appeals from the trial court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant entered an Alford plea of guilty to felony driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to three years in prison.

An Alford plea allows a defendant to plead guilty to the charged crime and accept criminal penalty even if he is unwilling or unable to admit he committed the acts constituting the crime. North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).
--------

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Costa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Jan 19, 2021
631 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Costa v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Anthony COSTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Jan 19, 2021

Citations

631 S.W.3d 623 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)