From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cosper v. Veros Credit, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Oct 19, 2015
2:15-cv-01752-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Opinion

          SCOTT J. HYMAN, ERIC J. TROUTMAN, SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation, Irvine, California ERIK KEMP, REBECCA S. SAELAO, SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, California Attorneys for Defendant VEROS CREDIT, LLC

          KEMNITZER, BARRON, & KRIEG, LLP Bryan Kemnitzer, Elliot Jason Conn, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.


          SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO AND INCLUDING OCTOBER 26, 2015

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

         Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules 143 and 144, plaintiffs YOLANDA COSPER and FRED LUMPKIN ("Plaintiffs"), and defendant Veros Credit, LLC ("Veros") hereby stipulate and agree, subject to this Court's approval, that Veros may have through and including October 26, 2015 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint.

         WHEREAS, pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 144, the parties previously stipulated that Veros could have one other extension, totaling twenty-eight (28) days-through and including October 16, 2015-to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint.

         WHEREAS, the parties have since engaged in early meet and confer efforts, and intend to continue to engage in such efforts, to exchange information in order to streamline the issues before this Court. To assist the parties in these efforts, the parties agree to stipulate to extend Veros' time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint from its current deadline of October 16, 2015 to through and including October 26, 2015, which is when the Parties' Joint Conference Statement also is due to be filed with the Court.

         WHEREAS, the requested extension will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by Court order.

         Now, therefore, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE and request that the Court permit Veros through and including October 26, 2015 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint.

         I, Rebecca S. Saelao, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Bryan Kemnitzer concurs in this filing.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cosper v. Veros Credit, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Oct 19, 2015
2:15-cv-01752-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Cosper v. Veros Credit, LLC

Case Details

Full title:YOLANDA COSPER and FRED LUMPKIN, individually and on behalf of all others…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-01752-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)