From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cosey v. Lilley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 20, 2020
18 CIVIL 11260 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 11260 (JGK)

05-20-2020

ARCHIE COSEY, Petitioner, v. LYNN LILLEY, Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Respondent


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 19, 2020, the Court has considered all the arguments raised by the parties; to the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit; for the reason's explained in the Opinion and Order, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. The Court will issue a certificate of appealability for the Court of Appeals to consider whether the petitioner has satisfied the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (2)(B) and whether the petitioner has made a sufficient showing to overcome the time bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); for the reasons explained in the Opinion and Order, the resolution of these issues involve substantial constitutional issues; the petition is dismissed, and this case is closed. DATED: New York, New York

May 20, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Cosey v. Lilley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 20, 2020
18 CIVIL 11260 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Cosey v. Lilley

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE COSEY, Petitioner, v. LYNN LILLEY, Superintendent of Woodbourne…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 20, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 11260 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2020)