From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corsey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 24, 1977
349 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1567.

August 24, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Ray E. Ulmer, Jr., J.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and W.C. McLain, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The judgment and sentence of the court recites that appellant was sentenced to fifteen years in prison "at hard labor." To be imprisoned "at hard labor" is improper because no existing Florida statute provides for imprisonment at hard labor as a sentence for any crime. McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Remanded for striking the phrase "at hard labor" in the judgment and sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C.J., and McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Corsey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 24, 1977
349 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Corsey v. State

Case Details

Full title:LINDA LOU CORSEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 24, 1977

Citations

349 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Therefore, we must vacate appellant's sentence and remand the case to the trial court for the imposition of a…

Gerlach v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, but we find the phrase "at hard labor" in the sentence…