From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corrado v. Prov. Redevelop. Agency

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 15, 1970
269 A.2d 551 (R.I. 1970)

Opinion

October 15, 1970.

PRESENT: Roberts, C.J., Paolino, Powers, Joslin and Kelleher, JJ.

APPEAL. Interlocutory Decree. Appealability. Interlocutory decree denying motion for a preliminary injunction, not being a final adjudication, was not reviewable on appeal.

Samuel Corrado, plaintiff, pro se.

Timothy J. McCarthy, Paul F. Casey, for Providence Redevelopment Agency.


This is an appeal from a Superior Court decree entered pursuant to the decision of a justice of that court denying the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction.

The decree being interlocutory and in nowise raising a question which has been finally adjudicated in the Superior Court, it is not reviewable here. Coen v. Corr, 90 R.I. 185, 156 A.2d 406.

The plaintiffs' appeal is denied and dismissed.


Summaries of

Corrado v. Prov. Redevelop. Agency

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 15, 1970
269 A.2d 551 (R.I. 1970)
Case details for

Corrado v. Prov. Redevelop. Agency

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL CORRADO AND DOROTHY CORRADO vs. PROVIDENCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY et…

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Oct 15, 1970

Citations

269 A.2d 551 (R.I. 1970)
269 A.2d 551

Citing Cases

Pezzullo v. Grande

The plaintiff has failed to show cause. Limiting our decision solely to the issue of prematurity, we would…

Corrado v. Providence Redevel. Agency

In an opinion filed on October 15, 1970, we held that the decree appealed from was interlocutory and raised…