From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coronado-Hidalgo v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 14, 2012
468 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 08-71614 Agency No. A075-110-233

02-14-2012

RAUL ARTURO CORONADO-HIDALGO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals


San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, FISHER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Raul Coronado-Hidalgo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' final order of removal and denial of his applications for a fraud waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H), cancellation of removal, and voluntary departure. Because the parties are familiar with the history of the case, we need not recount it here.

Following the BIA's decision in this case, our Court issued an opinion in Vasquez v. Holder, 602 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2010), which may have a bearing on the outcome of the petition for review. Because the BIA has not had an opportunity to evaluate this case in light of Vasquez and because the BIA has not considered the applicability of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H) to persons who lawfully entered the country, see id. at 1015 n.12, we remand the petition for review to the BIA for its reconsideration. Given the remand, we need not-and do not-express any opinion as to any issue raised by the parties.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

Coronado-Hidalgo v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 14, 2012
468 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Coronado-Hidalgo v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:RAUL ARTURO CORONADO-HIDALGO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2012)