Opinion
September 26, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision declaring that no contract for the sale of the subject premises shall be null and void on the grounds that the defendants did not allow the plaintiff a reasonable time to respond to an offer for the sale of the subject premises and did not allow the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to purchase the subject premises; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants, for reasons stated by Justice Hurowitz in the Supreme Court, Kings County (see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.