Corning Optical Commc'ns LLC v. Panduit Corp.

Full title: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellant v. PANDUIT CORP., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

2018-1903 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1903 2018-1905 2018-2058

08-08-2019

CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellant v. PANDUIT CORP., Appellee

JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN C. O'QUINN, HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01703, IPR2016-01709, IPR2017-00029.

JUDGMENT

JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN C. O'QUINN, HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court