Corning Glass Works v. Coe

Full title: CORNING GLASS WORKS, Appellant, v. Conway P. COE, Commissioner of Patents

Court: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Apr 10, 1944

141 F.2d 550 (D.C. Cir. 1944)

79 U.S. App. D.C. 395

Opinion

No. 8531.

Decided April 10, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Vernon M. Dorsey, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. E.L. Reynolds, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. W.W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER, Associate Justice, and PROCTOR, Associate Justice of the District Court.

PER CURIAM.

The findings and judgment of the trial court, 51 F. Supp. 232, find full support in the record. Appellant has failed to meet the burden imposed upon a plaintiff in a Section 4915 proceeding¹ and is not entitled to a patent.

1 35 U.S.C.A. § 63; Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 197, 198, 109 F.2d 449, 451, 452; Daniels v. Coe, 73 App.D.C. 54, 58, 116 F.2d 941, 945; Morrison v. Coe, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 220, 127 F.2d 737, 738.

Affirmed.