From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeland v. City of Camas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 30, 2020
CASE NO. C19-5935 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 30, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. C19-5935 BHS

01-30-2020

CARMEN COPELAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CAMAS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 12. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;

(2) Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. 6, is GRANTED and this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice; and

(3) The Clerk shall enter JUDGMENT and close this case.

Dated this 30th day of January, 2020.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Copeland v. City of Camas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 30, 2020
CASE NO. C19-5935 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Copeland v. City of Camas

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN COPELAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CAMAS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jan 30, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. C19-5935 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 30, 2020)

Citing Cases

Pac. Cnty. Tea Party v. Inslee

Although pro se pleadings are held to a “less stringent standard, ” pro se litigants must still “follow the…