From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coots v. Astrue

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Sep 22, 2009
Case No. 08-CV-2197 (C.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 08-CV-2197.

September 22, 2009


ORDER


Two Reports and Recommendations (#19, #20) were filed by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on September 3, 2009. On September 18, 2009, Plaintiff, Alger B. Coots, Jr., filed his Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations (#21). Following this court's careful de novo review of Judge Bernthal's reasoning and Plaintiff's Objections, this court agrees with and accepts Judge Bernthal's Reports and Recommendations (#19, #20).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) Judge Bernthal's Reports and Recommendations (#19, #20) are accepted by this court.

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand (#11) is DENIED.

(3) Defendant's Motion for an Order Which Affirms the Commissioner's Decision (#15) is GRANTED.

(4) This case is terminated.


Summaries of

Coots v. Astrue

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Sep 22, 2009
Case No. 08-CV-2197 (C.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Coots v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALGER B. COOTS, JR. Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

Case No. 08-CV-2197 (C.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Warner v. Astrue

Warner argues, however, that a limitation to “unskilled work” does not adequately account for moderate…

Susalla v. Astrue

Indeed, some courts have stated that "[o]nly if a doctor used the descriptive language to describe what work…