From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 18, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-272 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-272

04-18-2014

DAVID O. COOPER, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #19);

RESCINDING FEBRUARY 26, 2014, ORDER AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

(DOCS. ##16 AND 17); DIRECTING CLERK TO REOPEN CASE

Based on the reasoning set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, in his April 1, 2014, Report and Recommendations (Doc. #19), to which no Objections have been filed, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. The Court RESCINDS its February 26, 2014, Order dismissing the case for want of prosecution (Doc. #16), and the February 26, 2014, Judgment Entry (Doc. #17). The Clerk is directed to REOPEN the above-captioned case.

__________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cooper v. Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 18, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-272 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Cooper v. Montgomery Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID O. COOPER, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO SHERIFF'S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 18, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-272 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2014)