Opinion
11896N Index No. 451882/2014E Case No. 2020-00116
09-29-2020
Carolyn COOPER, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants–Appellants, Freedman Seating Company, et al., Defendants.
Shein & Associates, P.C., Syosset (Jeffrey Shein of counsel), for appellants. Rimland & Associates, New York (Glen P. Ahlers of counsel), for respondent.
Shein & Associates, P.C., Syosset (Jeffrey Shein of counsel), for appellants.
Rimland & Associates, New York (Glen P. Ahlers of counsel), for respondent.
Acosta, P.J., Webber, Moulton, Shulman, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered October 16, 2019, which granted plaintiff's motion to strike the answer of defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority d/b/a MTA New York City Transit, Access–A–Ride and CBT Para Transit, Inc. (MTA defendants), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly granted plaintiff's motion to strike the MTA defendants' answer (see CPLR 3126 ). The MTA defendants violated seven orders over the course of three years requiring the deposition of their witness to be held and offered no excuse for their repeated failure to comply. Such pattern of noncompliance gave rise to an inference of willful and contumacious conduct (see Rodriguez v. United Bronx Parents, Inc., 70 A.D.3d 492, 895 N.Y.S.2d 57 [1st Dept. 2010] ; Reidel v. Ryder TRS, Inc., 13 A.D.3d 170, 786 N.Y.S.2d 487 [1st Dept. 2004] ).
We have considered the MTA defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.