From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Dupnik

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 23, 1991
933 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

Nos. 88-15661, 88-15685.

May 23, 1991.

Michael P. Callahan, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Clarence Dupnik and Tom Taylor.

David L. Berkman, Murphy, Goering, Roberts Holt, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Weaver Barkman.

David F. Toone, Kimble, Gothreau Nelson, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Peter Ronstadt.

Stephen M. Weiss, Karp, Stoklin Weiss, Winton D. Woods, Michael J. Bloom, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Richard M. Bilby, Chief Judge.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Dupnik

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 23, 1991
933 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

Cooper v. Dupnik

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL COOPER, HUSBAND, IN HIS OWN CAPACITY AND AS PARENT OF ABRAM AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 23, 1991

Citations

933 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. Tilmer

The court based its decision on the ground that an attempt to secure a blood sample for evidence of…

Cooper v. Dupnik

Cooper successfully petitioned for a rehearing en banc. 933 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1991). The district court had…