From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Aug 9, 2012
Case No. 6:11-cv-06276-CL (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:11-cv-06276-CL

08-09-2012

CHERIE COOPER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge.

On the stipulation of the parties (#22), it is hereby ordered that the Commissioner's final decision is reversed and this matter is remanded for further administrative proceedings in accordance with sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, a new ALJ will conduct a de novo hearing. Plaintiff may raise any issue. The ALJ is free to reconsider any determination, but shall specifically evaluate the opinion of Robin Rose, M.D., regarding plaintiff's exertional and non-exertional limitations; reevaluate plaintiff's residual functional capacity and credibility, and continue the sequential evaluation process, obtaining vocational expert testimony if warranted. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. PANNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cooper v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Aug 9, 2012
Case No. 6:11-cv-06276-CL (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Cooper v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHERIE COOPER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:11-cv-06276-CL (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2012)