From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 19, 2023
4:22-cv-745-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-cv-745-DPM

01-19-2023

CAROLYN COOPER PLAINTIFF v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Cooper made two claims on her homeowner's policy. She believes Allstate didn't investigate sufficiently one of her claims - damage sustained when heavy machinery used to resurface a road caused her whole house to vibrate. Not investigating a claim adequately, though, isn't the kind of dishonest, malicious, or oppressive conduct that equals bad faith under Arkansas law. Reynolds v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co., 313 Ark. 145, 148, 852 S.W.2d 799, 801 (1993). Cooper also believes Allstate didn't do right on a hail damage claim. She had three inspections done, each of which estimated more than $8,500 of damage to her roof. Allstate offered her $307.11. But offers to compromise, even low-ball offers, likewise aren't a sufficient showing of bad faith. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Broadway Arms Corp., 281 Ark. 128, 133, 664 S.W.2d 463, 465 (1984). Motion, Doc. 4, granted. Count II of her complaint (bad faith) is dismissed without prejudice; count I (breach of contract) goes forward.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 19, 2023
4:22-cv-745-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Cooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN COOPER PLAINTIFF v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

4:22-cv-745-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 19, 2023)