From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooksey v. McElroy

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 25, 2009
Case No. 1:07cv581 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 25, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07cv581.

August 25, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on July 16, 2009 (Doc. 74).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Immediate Motion for Stay (Doc. 68) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Cooksey v. McElroy

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 25, 2009
Case No. 1:07cv581 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Cooksey v. McElroy

Case Details

Full title:Othel L. Cooksey, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Bobby McElroy, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:07cv581 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Simkins v. Spears

Additionally, "[t]he Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996 provides that a [judicial officer] may not be…

Simkins v. Spears

Additionally, "[t]he Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996 provides that a [judicial officer] may not be…