From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 3, 1920
85 So. 823 (Ala. Crim. App. 1920)

Opinion

8 Div. 696.

February 3, 1920.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; F. Loyd Tate, Judge.

Lib Cook and Maggie Holt were convicted of living together in a state of adulterous fornication, and they appealed. Reversed and remanded.

Wert Hutson, of Decatur, for appellants.

The evidence did not make out a case, and the defendants were entitled to an acquittal. 4 Port. 467; 29 Ala. 313.

J.Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No brief reached the Reporter.


To sustain a conviction for the offense of adultery or fornication, there must be proven by the state, beyond a reasonable doubt, either by direct evidence or by facts and circumstances that will warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion that there has been at least one act of illicit intercourse, with an agreement between the defendants, either expressed or implied, to continue the relation whenever opportunity offered and they so desire. Brown's Case, 108 Ala. 18, 18 So. 811.

We have examined the record in this case and the evidence utterly fails to justify a conviction, but rather indicates that the prosecution was in retaliation for one of the, defendants and her two sons having testified against one of the state's witnesses in a prosecution against him.

The motion for a new trial should have been granted.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Cook v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 3, 1920
85 So. 823 (Ala. Crim. App. 1920)
Case details for

Cook v. State

Case Details

Full title:COOK et al. v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 3, 1920

Citations

85 So. 823 (Ala. Crim. App. 1920)
17 Ala. App. 347

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

Culbreath v. State, ante, p. 143, 113 So. 465; Burt v. State, 20 Ala. App. 296, 101 So. 768. Defendants'…

Dodson v. State

O. E. Young, of Vernon, and W. H. Hogan, of Fayette, for appellants. Cite: Cook v. State, 17 Ala. App. 347,…