From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 22, 1983
97 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 22, 1983


Order entered September 22, 1982 in Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Nadel, J.), denying defendant's motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion is granted and the second cause of action seeking punitive damages is dismissed, without costs. Plaintiffs, insured by defendant, submitted claims for water damage to their downstairs ceiling when the shower base of their upstairs bathroom cracked. Defendant refused to pay, asserting that the crack was a structural problem related to the settling of the house. Plaintiff's suit seeks both actual damages in the amount of $1,950 and punitive damages of $250,000, alleging that defendant's refusal to pay was a malicious, willful and improper act based on pure malice and bad faith. Special Term refused to dismiss this cause of action seeking punitive damages, finding an issue of fact as to whether defendant acted with "that gross bad faith in the processing of the claim [which] may warrant the award of punitive damages (see Gordon v. Nation-wide Mutual Insurance Co. 30 N.Y.2d 427)." We disagree. Plaintiffs have made no showing of fraudulent, criminal or dishonest acts by the insurer concerning or affecting the general public so as to warrant a recovery of punitive or exemplary damages ( Halpin v Prudential Ins. Co., 48 N.Y.2d 906; Royal Globe Ins. Co. v Chock Full O'Nuts Corp., 86 A.D.2d 315; Cohen v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 65 A.D.2d 71; Holoness Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 75 A.D.2d 569). Clearly, the action is founded upon a private breach of contract and does not allege a fraudulent and deceitful scheme in dealing with the general public so as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations. Moreover, it is well settled that a claim for punitive damages may not be interposed as a separate cause of action (see Carroll v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 88 A.D.2d 527; APS Food Systems v Ward Foods, 70 A.D.2d 483).

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Asch, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Cook v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 22, 1983
97 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Cook v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL COOK et al., Respondents, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 22, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

White v. Blue Cross

The principle has been adopted by the Court of Appeals (Halpin vPrudential Ins. Co., 48 N.Y.2d 906, supra)…

Samovar of Russia v. Generali

We have consistently adhered to the standard of Walker v Sheldon ( supra) in rejecting claims for punitive…