Conway v. Smelosky

Full title: EDWARD D. CONWAY, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL A. SMELOSKY, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

CV 08-5181-DDP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)

Opinion

EDWARD D. CONWAY, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL A. SMELOSKY, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-5181-DDP (AGR) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 10, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition with prejudice.