Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-00038
04-30-2013
ORDER
Before the Court is "Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Petition, Petition for Injunction and Restraining Order" (D.E. 7). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.3, opposed motions will be submitted to the judge 21 days from filing. The Motion was filed on February 21, 2013 and its submission date was March 14, 2013. Respondents have not filed a response to the Motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.4, failure to respond is taken as a representation of no opposition to the relief sought. The Court finds that Respondents' default further demonstrates a failure to prosecute their claims subject to the Motion.
The Court, after reviewing the Motion and the Respondents' state court Original Petition, finds that the Original Petition (D.E. 1-1) is insufficient to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to pleading standards, as more fully discussed in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1966 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009). For these reasons, the Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 7) is GRANTED with respect to its request for "any other and further relief to which it may be justly entitled" and Respondents are ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint in compliance with Twombly and Iqbal on or before May 7, 2013.
____________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE