From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CONWAY v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 14, 2007
4:07CV3066 (D. Neb. Nov. 14, 2007)

Opinion

4:07CV3066.

November 14, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On October 5, 2007, the court entered a memorandum and order granting the plaintiff an 11-day enlargement of time, until November 2, 2007, to respond to the defendant's partial motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff filed a timely brief in opposition to the summary judgment motion on November 1, 2007, but the brief did not include a response to the plaintiff's statement of material facts, as required by our local rules. See NECivR 56.1(b)(1).

The rule provides: "The party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall include in its brief a concise response to the moving party's statement of material facts. The response shall address each numbered paragraph in the movant's statement and, in the case of any disagreement, contain pinpoint references to affidavits, pleadings, discovery responses, deposition testimony (by page and line), or other materials upon which the opposing party relies. Properly referenced material facts in the movant's statement will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the opposing party's response." NECivR 56.1(b)(1) (emphasis in original).

However, in a separate motion also filed on November 1, 2007, the plaintiff requested an additional enlargement of time, until November 29, 2007, to respond to the defendant's statement of material facts. The defendant opposes the request for a variety of reasons, including the plaintiff's failure to submit affidavits showing the need for a continuance. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f).

The plaintiff's counsel represents that the additional time is needed to obtain an expert's report, which is not due until November 19, 2007, and also the transcript of a deposition. Significantly, it does not appear that the defendant will be prejudiced if the requested enlargement of time is granted.

The defendant has also filed a "motion to stay" the filing its reply pending disposition of the plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. The plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time (filing 40) is granted, and the plaintiff shall have until November 29, 2007, to respond to the defendant's statement of material facts.
2. The defendant's motion to stay (filing 42) is granted, and the defendant shall have five business days after service of the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of material facts in which to file a reply.


Summaries of

CONWAY v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 14, 2007
4:07CV3066 (D. Neb. Nov. 14, 2007)
Case details for

CONWAY v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN S. CON WAY, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 14, 2007

Citations

4:07CV3066 (D. Neb. Nov. 14, 2007)