From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Convey v. Atria Mgmt.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 13, 2024
2:24-cv-00849-RGK-RAO (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00849-RGK-RAO

03-13-2024

Marilyn Convey, Plaintiff(s), v. Atria Management Company, LLC, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 7, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution [16] (“OSC”), which ordered Defendants to respond to the operative Complaint by March 11, 2024, or alternatively, for Plaintiff to apply for entry of default by March 13, 2024. Although the OSC indicated that a stipulation to extend dates was not a proper response, the parties, on March 7, 2024, filed an untimely Stipulation to extend Defendants' answer deadline [16]. Plaintiff then filed a Response [19] to the OSC on March 12, 2023. Because neither party filed a proper response to the OSC, this action is dismissed for Plaintiff's lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Convey v. Atria Mgmt.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 13, 2024
2:24-cv-00849-RGK-RAO (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Convey v. Atria Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:Marilyn Convey, Plaintiff(s), v. Atria Management Company, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00849-RGK-RAO (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)