From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contreraz v. Stockbridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 15, 2013
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01817-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01817-LJO-SKO PC

01-15-2013

MICHAEL CONTRERAZ, Plaintiff, v. J. STOCKBRIDGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION

FOR AN ORDER REVOKING IFP STATUS


(Doc. 114)


TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Michael Contreraz, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 14, 2006. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed on February 3, 2009, against Defendants Stockbridge-Cota, Rodriguez, Franco, Davis, and Carlos for violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. On December 11, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for an order revoking Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Identified as Stockbridge in the amended complaint.

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Local Rule 230(l). Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Contreraz v. Stockbridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 15, 2013
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01817-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Contreraz v. Stockbridge

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CONTRERAZ, Plaintiff, v. J. STOCKBRIDGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01817-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013)