From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contreraz v. City of Tacoma

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 19, 2024
3:22-cv-05106 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 19, 2024)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05106

04-19-2024

ZIMMERI CONTRERAZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TACOMA; SOUTH SOUND 911; CHRISTOPHER BAIN, Defendants.


ORDER

Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge

Plaintiff Zimmeri Contreraz filed a Notice of Settlement on April 17, 2024, stating the parties had “reached a settlement” and that they intend to file a stipulated dismissal within 30 days. Dkt. No. 167. The Court strikes the trial date and all related deadlines. The Court DENIES as moot Contreraz's pending motion in limine, Dkt. No. 163. As for Contreraz's pending motions for attorneys' fees and costs on his PRA claim, Dkt. Nos. 142 and 150, the parties must advise the Court immediately if these pending motions are not part of any compromise agreement and the parties are thus still seeking a Court ruling. Otherwise, the parties must file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 without requesting action by this Court or provide the Court with a joint status report regarding their progress in perfecting settlement within 30 days of entry of this order.


Summaries of

Contreraz v. City of Tacoma

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 19, 2024
3:22-cv-05106 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Contreraz v. City of Tacoma

Case Details

Full title:ZIMMERI CONTRERAZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TACOMA; SOUTH SOUND 911…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 19, 2024

Citations

3:22-cv-05106 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 19, 2024)