From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contreras v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 17, 2016
No. 71252 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)

Opinion

No. 71252

11-17-2016

GUSTAVO CONTRERAS, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

cc: Gustavo Contreras Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the validity of a judgment of conviction. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Gustavo Contreras

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Contreras v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 17, 2016
No. 71252 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Contreras v. State

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAVO CONTRERAS, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 17, 2016

Citations

No. 71252 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)