Opinion
No. 3D18-2543
08-14-2019
CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Appellant, v. Karen ROSENTHAL, etc., et al., Appellees.
Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter (Fort Lauderdale) and Giovanna Abreu O'Connor (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Dewsnup King Olsen Worel Havas Mortensen, and Paul M. Simmons (Salt Lake City, Utah); Roberts, P.A., and H. Clay Roberts, for appellees.
Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter (Fort Lauderdale) and Giovanna Abreu O'Connor (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
Dewsnup King Olsen Worel Havas Mortensen, and Paul M. Simmons (Salt Lake City, Utah); Roberts, P.A., and H. Clay Roberts, for appellees.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. Prob. R. 5.460(a) (providing: "If, after an estate is closed, additional property of the decedent is discovered or if further administration of the estate is required for any other reason, any interested person may file a petition for further administration of the estate. The petition shall be filed in the same probate file as the original administration"); Mathis v. Estate of Mathis, 178 So. 3d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (applying abuse of discretion standard in reviewing probate court's order on motion for subsequent administration pursuant to rule 5.460 ).