From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Global Allies, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 17, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-03237-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-03237-MCE-KJN

01-17-2013

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. GLOBAL ALLIES, LLC, Defendant. GLOBAL ALLIES, LLC, Counter-Claimant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Counter-Defendant.

John S. Rossiter, Bar No. 151113 Joren Bass, Bar No. 208143 Jacqueline Young, Bar No. 280374 PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Defendant Global Allies, LLC


John S. Rossiter, Bar No. 151113
Joren Bass, Bar No. 208143
Jacqueline Young, Bar No. 280374
PERKINS COIE LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Global Allies, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY

AND TO FILE AMENDED

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST VALLEY

FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY


Assigned to the Honorable Morrison C.

England, Jr.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2010, a lawsuit was filed against Defendant Global Allies, LLC ("Global Allies"), in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entitled Global Total Office, Ltd. et al. v. Global Allies, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-01896 (hereinafter, the "GTO Action");

WHEREAS, on December 6, 2011, Plaintiffs Continental Casualty Company ("Continental") and Valley Forge Insurance Company ("Valley Forge") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed this action for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 seeking a declaration that they have no duty to defend or indemnify Global Allies under Plaintiffs' insurance policies with regard to the underlying GTO Action;

WHEREAS, following stipulated stays of this Action, Global Allies filed an Answer and Counterclaim against Continental on July 20, 2012 [ECF No. 21].

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2012, Continental filed a Motion to Dismiss and for Partial Summary Judgment (the "Motion to Dismiss"), regarding its duty to defend Global Allies in the GTO Action [ECF No. 22];

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2012, this Court entered a Memorandum and Order granting the Motion to Stay pending resolution of the underlying GTO Action; denying the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice; directing Continental to refile the Motion to Dismiss when the stay is lifted, if Continental chooses to do so; and ordering that Global Allies notify the Court upon termination of the GTO Action [ECF No. 32];

WHEREAS, on November 29, 2012, the Honorable Sharon J. Coleman of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois terminated the GTO Action by dismissing it with prejudice following a settlement of the GTO Action;

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2012, this Court entered an Order pursuant to stipulation lifting the stay and requiring Continental to file a responsive pleading to Global Allies' Counterclaims by January 11, 2013 [ECF No. 34];

WHEREAS the parties agree that all insurance coverage issues pertaining to Continental, an umbrella insurer, in this Action are now moot due to the resolution of the GTO Action, and that the only remaining issues to be resolved in this Action pertain to the primary policies issued by Valley Forge;

WHEREAS the parties agree that Global Allies' Counterclaims against Continental should be dismissed with prejudice and without attorneys' fees or costs to either party;

WHEREAS the parties further agree that Global Allies may file an amended pleading withdrawing its Counterclaims against Continental and adding Counterclaims against Valley Forge related to the duties of defense and indemnity under the policies Valley Forge issued to Global Allies;

Now, therefore, it is hereby stipulated by Continental, Valley Forge, and Defendant Global Allies, by and through their respective attorneys, as follows:

1. Due to the resolution and dismissal of the GTO Action on November 29, 2012, all insurance coverage issues pertaining to Continental, an umbrella insurer, in this Action are now moot due to the resolution of the GTO Action.
2. The only remaining issues to be resolved in this Action pertain to defense and indemnification under the primary policies issued to Global Allies by Valley Forge.
3. Global Allies' Counterclaims against Continental shall be dismissed with prejudice and without attorneys' fees or costs to either party.
4. On or before January 18, 2013, Global Allies will file an amended pleading withdrawing its Counterclaims against Continental and adding Counterclaims against Valley Forge related to defense and indemnification under the policies Valley Forge issued to Global Allies.
5. On or before February 8, 2013, Valley Forge will file its responsive pleading to Global Allies' Counterclaim.
6. By entering into this Stipulation, neither Plaintiffs nor Global Allies waive any defenses, rights, or privileges.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

COLLIAU CARLUCCIO KEENER MORROW

PETERSON & PARSONS

By: ____________

Robert C. Christensen

Marsha L. Morrow

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PERKINS COIE LLP

By: ____________

John S. Rossiter, Jr.

Attorney for Defendant

Global Allies, LLC.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties:

1. Global Allies' Counterclaims against Continental are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without attorneys' fees or costs to either party.
2. Global Allies shall file an amended pleading withdrawing its Counterclaims against Continental and adding Counterclaims against Valley Forge on or before January 18, 2013.
3. Valley Forge will file its responsive pleading to Global Allies' Counterclaim on or before February 8, 2013.
4. The Order requiring Continental to file a responsive pleading by January 11, 2013 is hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Global Allies, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 17, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-03237-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Global Allies, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-03237-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)