From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constitutional Concepts Foundation v. Bridgeline Capital

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jun 29, 2009
Case No. 2:07-CV-641 (D. Utah Jun. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-CV-641.

June 29, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on May 19, 2009, recommending that this case be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute and for failure to provide the court with the requisite proof of service to show that the summons and complaint have been served on each of the Defendants. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)

The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within ten (10) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection.

Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES Plaintiffs' Complaint, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Constitutional Concepts Foundation v. Bridgeline Capital

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jun 29, 2009
Case No. 2:07-CV-641 (D. Utah Jun. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Constitutional Concepts Foundation v. Bridgeline Capital

Case Details

Full title:CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPTS FOUNDATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRIDGELINE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:07-CV-641 (D. Utah Jun. 29, 2009)