Constantino v. Constantino

Full title: ESMERALDO CONSTANTINO, Appellant, v. HELENE TADAY CONSTANTINO, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 31, 2002

Case No. 4D01-3377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 31, 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-3377.

Opinion filed July 31, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert B. Carney, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-18863 3790.

Steven Friedman of Law Office of Steven Friedman, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.

Donald J. Vestal of Donald J. Vestal, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's June 25, 2002, motion for clarification is granted and we clarify our original opinion issued June 19, 2002, as follows.

On remand, in redetermining the final support obligation under section 61.30, Florida Statutes, the trial court may receive and consider all relevant factual evidence, including evidence of any factual matters which may have arisen subsequent to the initial determination.

POLEN, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL THE DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.