From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constancio v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 4, 2014
NO. 03-14-00221-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-14-00221-CR

11-04-2014

Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. A-13-1024-SA, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant's counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, — S.W.3d —, No. PD-0702-13, 2014 WL 2865901, at *4 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant's pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before November 14, 2014. See Kelly, — S.W.3d —, 2014 WL 2865901, at *4.

It is ordered on November 4, 2014. Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Constancio v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 4, 2014
NO. 03-14-00221-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Constancio v. State

Case Details

Full title:Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Nov 4, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-14-00221-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2014)