From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constancio v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Sep 2, 2015
NO. 03-14-00411-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 2, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-14-00411-CR

09-02-2015

Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
NO. A-11-0535-S, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant's counsel has certified to the Court that she provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant's pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before September 14, 2015. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on September 2, 2015. Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Constancio v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Sep 2, 2015
NO. 03-14-00411-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Constancio v. State

Case Details

Full title:Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Sep 2, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-14-00411-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 2, 2015)