From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constance Parker v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 2, 2024
2:23-cv-08527-FMO-AJR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-08527-FMO-AJR

02-02-2024

CONSTANCE PARKER Plaintiff(s), v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Defendant(s).


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Constance Parker v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 2, 2024
2:23-cv-08527-FMO-AJR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Constance Parker v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANCE PARKER Plaintiff(s), v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-08527-FMO-AJR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2024)