From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 13, 1987
502 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. BM-253.

February 13, 1987.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner, William Wieland, J.

John E. Mclain, III of Cooper, Rissman Weisberg, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

George J. Adler, Orlando, for appellee.


While there was error in the order of the deputy commissioner regarding medical testimony establishing permanent impairment, "based on AMA [American Medical Association] guidelines," we deem the error to be harmless. There was competent medical testimony establishing that the claimant suffered a permanent impairment and that the guidelines did not apply to the condition suffered by the claimant. We note that when permanent impairment cannot reasonably be determined under the guidelines, it "may be established under other generally accepted medical criteria for determining impairment." Trindade v. Abbey Road Beef `N Booze, 443 So.2d 1007, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 13, 1987
502 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Consoweld Distributors v. Slaughter

Case Details

Full title:CONSOWELD DISTRIBUTORS AND SENTRY INSURANCE, APPELLANTS, v. WILLIE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 13, 1987

Citations

502 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Fuster v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

This court has held that when permanent impairment cannot reasonably be determined under the AMA guidelines,…