From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consford v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 26, 1917
200 Ala. 23 (Ala. 1917)

Opinion

4 Div. 722.

April 26, 1917.

W. O. Mulkey, of Geneva, and Farmer Farmer, of Dothan, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Harvell G. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The only points upon which a review of the Court of Appeals is urged in brief of counsel relate to a finding of facts by the said court, or in the application of the law to the facts, and we have repeatedly held that we will not review or revise the conclusions and findings of the Court of Appeals in these respects. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91, and cases there cited.

The writ is denied.

McCLELLAN, SAYRE, and GARDNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Consford v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 26, 1917
200 Ala. 23 (Ala. 1917)
Case details for

Consford v. State

Case Details

Full title:CONSFORD v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 26, 1917

Citations

200 Ala. 23 (Ala. 1917)
75 So. 335

Citing Cases

Royal Ins. Co. v. Story

The second challenge for error is manifestly untenable, since we will not review the findings of the Court of…

Morrison v. State

Shouse v. State, 258 Ala. 499, 63 So.2d 728, denying certiorari Shouse v. State, 36 Ala. App. 614, 63 So.2d…