Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service

Full title: CONSERVATION CONGRESS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

2:12-CV-02416-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)

Opinion

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendants. No. 2:12-CV-02416-WBS-KJN United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division. April 2, 2013

          STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         WHEREAS, the parties recently stipulated to the dismissal of one of Plaintiff's claims;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff, at this time, anticipates no amendments to the Complaint, and the parties agree any such amendments would, pursuant to the Federal Rules, require a showing of good cause;

         WHEREAS, the Court allowed limited discovery regarding Plaintiff's claims against the U.S. Forest Service, and denied Defendants' motion to limit review to the record without prejudice to renewal at a later time, ECF No. 29;

         WHEREAS, the parties agree that this stipulation will foster the interests of judicial economy;

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2)(A), the Court may order limitations on the number of requests under Rule 36; Now, therefore, the parties stipulate as follows:

1. The undersigned parties hereby stipulate that Federal Defendants and Plaintiff each shall propound no more than 25 requests for admission, in total, regardless of the number of Defendants in the case;

          ORDER

         Finding good cause, and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(2)(A), the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulated request.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.