From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2015
2:13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          Rachel Fazio, Sean Malone, (Pro Hac Vice) Elisabeth Holmes, (Pro Hac Vice) Blue River Law, P.C., Cedar Ridge, CA. Eugene, OR. Attorneys for Plaintiff.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney.

          GREGORY T. BRODERICK, Assistant United States Attorney.


          JOINT STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES BY 10 DAYS

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         In this matter, the Plaintiff challenges the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement Project, located in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. The Plaintiff challenges the Defendants' August 29, 2013 decision, served its Complaint on September 26, 2013, and the United States filed a motion to dismiss on January 9, 2014. ECF No. 1, 15. On November 19, 2014 the Court denied the Defendants' motion to dismiss and set a briefing schedule. ECF No. 25-27. Defendant U.S. Forest Service filed its Administrative Record (AR) on June 8, 2015. ECF No. 31. Defendant U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service filed its AR on November 16, 2105. ECF No. 38.

         The parties have met and conferred on the Plaintiffs' objections to the Defendants' Administrative Records, and the Parties respectfully request that this Court continue all dates in this matter by ten (10) days so as to allow the parties the opportunity to continue their attempts to resolve disputes regarding the Administrative Records and correct any deficiencies without the court's assistance.

         The Parties agree that (1) if they are unable to resolve the Plaintiffs' Objections to Administrative Records the Plaintiff shall file its Objections on December 10, 2015, and (2) all remaining deadlines in this case (ECF No. 37) be continued by ten (10) days.

         The Parties' Joint Stipulated Motion to continue case deadlines by 10 days to pursue settlement opportunities is hereby ALLOWED.


Summaries of

Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2015
2:13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service

Case Details

Full title:CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a non-profit organization, Plaintiff, v. UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 2, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2015)