From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conservation Cong. v. U.S. Forest Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Apr 3, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-02416-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-02416-WBS-KJN

04-03-2013

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendants.

For Plaintiff: Marianne Dugan (as authorized) Marianne Dugan James J. Tutchton (CA Bar No. 150908) Tutchton Law Office For Defendants: BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DAVID SHELLEDY Civil Division Chief Eastern District of California United States Attorney's Office IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division Andrea Gelatt, CA Bar # 262617 Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Stuart Gillespie, CO Bar No. 42861 Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section Benjamin Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Alison D. Garner, DC Bar No. 983858 Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Natural Resources Section Environment & Natural Resources Division


COUNSEL IDENTIFICATION ON
SIGNATURE PAGE

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING DISCOVERY

WHEREAS, the parties recently stipulated to the dismissal of one of Plaintiff's claims;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, at this time, anticipates no amendments to the Complaint, and the parties agree any such amendments would, pursuant to the Federal Rules, require a showing of good cause;

WHEREAS, the Court allowed limited discovery regarding Plaintiff's claims against the U.S. Forest Service, and denied Defendants' motion to limit review to the record without prejudice to renewal at a later time, ECF No. 29;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that this stipulation will foster the interests of judicial economy;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2)(A), the Court may order limitations on the number of requests under Rule 36; Now, therefore, the parties stipulate as follows:

1. The undersigned parties hereby stipulate that Federal Defendants and Plaintiff each shall propound no more than 25 requests for admission, in total, regardless of the number of Defendants in the case;

Respectfully Submitted, For Plaintiff:

Marianne Dugan (as authorized)

Marianne Dugan

James J. Tutchton (CA Bar No. 150908)

Tutchton Law Office
For Defendants:

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DAVID SHELLEDY

Civil Division Chief

Eastern District of California

United States Attorney's Office

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Environment and Natural Resources Division

______________________

Andrea Gelatt, CA Bar # 262617

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Wildlife & Marine Resources Section

Stuart Gillespie, CO Bar No. 42861

Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section

Benjamin Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611

Alison D. Garner, DC Bar No. 983858

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Natural Resources Section

Environment & Natural Resources Division

ORDER

Finding good cause, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(A), the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulated request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that today, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court via CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such to the attorneys of record.

______________________

ANDREA GELATT


Summaries of

Conservation Cong. v. U.S. Forest Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Apr 3, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-02416-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Conservation Cong. v. U.S. Forest Serv.

Case Details

Full title:CONSERVATION CONGRESS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-02416-WBS-KJN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)