From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conover v. Suddath

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 2011
427 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-1016.

Submitted: April 28, 2011.

Decided: May 3, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-03299-AW).

Roy Suddath, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Roy Suddath appeals the district court's orders remanding this case back to state court and denying reconsideration. Because the remand order was based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the district court's order is not subject to review. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We further deny Suddath's motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Conover v. Suddath

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 2011
427 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Conover v. Suddath

Case Details

Full title:Timi Ann CONOVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy SUDDATH, Defendant-Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

427 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2011)