From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connors v. Harnois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Since the plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable excuse as to why the additional facts submitted on the purported motion for renewal were not submitted on the original application, the motion was in actuality a motion for reargument. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reargument (see, King v Rockaway One Co., 202 A.D.2d 395). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Connors v. Harnois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Connors v. Harnois

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CONNORS, Appellant, v. PATRICIA W. HARNOIS et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 814