From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven
Dec 9, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 10923 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Opinion

No. CV 0327003S

December 9, 1992.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION


This is an underinsured motorist action in which the defendant alleges that coverage is barred by a provision of the policy which states "We do not provide Uninsured Motorist Coverage for property damage or bodily injury sustained by any person: (1) if that person or the legal representative settles the bodily injury or property damage claim without our consent."

An action brought on these grounds can only be maintained when all the other applicable insurance coverage is exhausted. The defendant could not conceivably have any grounds to withhold their consent to a settlement for the limits of the policy. The contract provision of the policy does not apply to these circumstances and the evils it is designed to prevent are not a possibility in this case. The lack of consent to a settlement for the policy limits does not prejudice the defendant and in this case is not a valid defense to the plaintiff's claims.

The Motion to Strike the Special Defense is therefore granted.

O'KEEFE, J.


Summaries of

Connor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven
Dec 9, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 10923 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)
Case details for

Connor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CONNOR v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven

Date published: Dec 9, 1992

Citations

1992 Ct. Sup. 10923 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Citing Cases

Pinto v. Norfolk Dedham Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Continental Insurance Co v. Cebe-Habersky, 214 Conn. 209, 571 A.2d 104 (1990) (insured settled for $17,000.00…

Bertz v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.

The court therefore found that the insurer's "consent-to-settle" clause, although based on a valid…