From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Room

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2015
No. 2:13-CV-1685-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:13-CV-1685-JAM-CMK-P

10-15-2015

THYRONE CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. CDC FOLSOM MAIL ROOM, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion (Doc. 16) for reconsideration of the court's June 2, 2015, final judgment.

The court may grant reconsideration of a final judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458-59 (9th Cir. 1995). The motion must be filed no later than twenty-eight (28) days after entry of the judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).

Plaintiff's motion appears to be untimely. Final judgment was entered on June 2, 2015. Plaintiff's motion was filed on July 22, 2015. Because the motion is not dated and is not accompanied by a proof of service or any statement as to when it was delivered to prison officials for mailing, it is impossible to assign an earlier filing date pursuant to Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

In any event, plaintiff has not demonstrated grounds for reconsideration. Here, plaintiff's case was dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. Specifically, plaintiff failed to resolve the fee status for the case. Contrary to plaintiff's argument that the court failed to properly consider whether dismissal was an appropriate sanction, a review of the record reflects that the court considered all the relevant factors. See Findings and Recommendations at Doc. 12.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 16) for reconsideration is denied. DATED: October 15, 2015

/s/ John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Connor v. Room

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2015
No. 2:13-CV-1685-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Connor v. Room

Case Details

Full title:THYRONE CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. CDC FOLSOM MAIL ROOM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 15, 2015

Citations

No. 2:13-CV-1685-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)