From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Folsom Trust Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1761 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1761 CKD P

10-07-2015

THYRONE CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. FOLSOM TRUST OFFICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On August 25, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: October 7, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
conn1761.fifp


Summaries of

Connor v. Folsom Trust Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1761 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Connor v. Folsom Trust Office

Case Details

Full title:THYRONE CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. FOLSOM TRUST OFFICE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1761 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2015)