From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Blodnick Abramowitz Blodnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 1997
242 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

August 18, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Brien, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth causes of action, since, with respect to those claims, the defendants established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and the plaintiff failed to proffer sufficient proof to demonstrate the existence of material issues of fact ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Connor v. Blodnick Abramowitz Blodnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 1997
242 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Connor v. Blodnick Abramowitz Blodnick

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN W. O CONNOR, Appellant, v. BLODNICK ABRAMOWITZ BLODNICK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 18, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 975

Citing Cases

Fitch v. TMF Systems, Inc.

Plaintiffs' action against defendant based on conversion must also fail. Defendant demonstrated that he never…