Opinion
Submitted October 28th, 1933.
Decided January 5th, 1934.
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fallon, whose opinion is reported under the title of Connolly v. Connolly, 112 N.J. Eq. 434.
Messrs. Collins Corbin ( Edward A. Markley, of counsel), for the appellant.
Mr. Mario Turtur ( Fred E. Shepard, of counsel), for the respondent.
We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have examined the contention of the appellant that "the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive." We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.