From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 12, 1969
229 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-233.

December 12, 1969.

Appeal from the Court of Record for Manatee County, Robert H. Schultz, J.

V. William Kaklis of Miller Gallen, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order denying appellant relief under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence. The Assistant Public Defender was appointed to represent appellant immediately prior to trial. Appellant in his motion states that counsel did not have sufficient time to properly prepare for trial.

The amount of time that elapsed between appointment and trial is not in and of itself sufficient to sustain a bare allegation that counsel was not appointed in time to properly represent the defendant. See State v. Barton, Fla. 1967, 194 So.2d 241; Brown v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 191 So.2d 612; Keehn v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 221 So.2d 26.

For the foregoing reasons the order denying relief sought under CrPR 1.850 is hereby affirmed.

HOBSON, C.J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 12, 1969
229 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Conner v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR R. CONNER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 12, 1969

Citations

229 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Fuller v. Wainwright

This does not in itself establish incompetent representation. Brown v. State, 191 So.2d 612 (Fla.App.3rd,…