Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:06CV80-P-B.
September 4, 2007
ORDER
This matter comes before the court upon Plaintiff's objection to U.S. Magistrate's July 7, 2007 Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [94]. After due consideration of the objection, the court finds as follows, to-wit:
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), the district judge to whom the case is assigned shall consider objections to, or appeals of, a non-dispositive ruling by the U.S. Magistrate Judge on a clearly-erroneous or contrary-to-law standard. Having considered the U.S. Magistrate Judge's July 7, 2007 Order denying the Plaintiff's motion to compel production of a piece of the subject skylight, as well as the Plaintiff's original motion and her objections to the U.S. Magistrate Judge's ruling, the court concludes that the Plaintiff has not demonstrated that said ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's objection to U.S. Magistrate's July 7, 2007 Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [94] is OVERRULED.
SO ORDERED